The Appellate Division of the Singapore High Court dismissed the ESR group's appeal and upheld the ruling that ESR, as sponsor of the outgoing manager, had a material interest and could not vote on the trust-deed amendments needed for internalisation.
Quarz Capital was a party to the proceedings as a significant unitholder.
Summary prepared by Quarz Capital from public reporting by Singapore Courts (judgment). Refer to the original publication for the full article.
More news
All news →14 Jun 2024 · Singapore Courts (judgment)High Court rules that ESR has a material interest and cannot vote on internalisation amendments27 Feb 2024 · PR NewswireRequisitionists urge Sabana REIT unitholders to vote for all resolutions at the 8 March 2024 EGM6 Dec 2023 · PR NewswireSabana REIT unitholders ask MAS and SGX RegCo for guidance on internalisation and sponsor voting

