On an application by the trustee, the Singapore High Court ruled that the ESR entities, which held about 21% of Sabana REIT, could not vote on the trust-deed amendments required to internalise the manager.
Quarz Capital, then holding about 14%, was a defendant in the proceedings alongside ESR.
Summary prepared by Quarz Capital from public reporting by Singapore Courts (judgment). Refer to the original publication for the full article.
More news
All news →27 Feb 2024 · PR NewswireRequisitionists urge Sabana REIT unitholders to vote for all resolutions at the 8 March 2024 EGM6 Dec 2023 · PR NewswireSabana REIT unitholders ask MAS and SGX RegCo for guidance on internalisation and sponsor voting10 Nov 2023 · PR NewswireQuarz Capital urges Cromwell European REIT to begin a unit buyback

